An appointment with 'Dr Google': Benefits and limitations of using internet‐based health information
Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 21 (2):7 (2015)
AbstractSimonet, Emanuel Nicolas Cortes The Internet has made seeking for health information easy and convenient. This information provides medical knowledge which has the potential to empower both patients and health professionals. However, It is concerning that patients may attempt to use this type of information for self-diagnostic purposes, particularly those who are unfamiliar with medical terminology. Understanding web- based information effectively is most important to enable appropriate and informed healthcare decisions. Consequently, a new role for health professionals is indicated, requiring them to become familiar with the health information available on the Internet, to direct patients to reliable sources, and to assist them in understanding and interpreting web-based health information.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Searching for Health: The Topography of the First Page. [REVIEW]Jill McTavish, Roma Harris & Nadine Wathen - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):227-240.
E-Medicine and Health Care Consumers: Recognizing Current Problems and Possible Resolutions for a Safer Environment. [REVIEW]Maria Brann & James G. Anderson - 2002 - Health Care Analysis 10 (4):403-415.
Information Technology, Education and Health Care: Constructivism in the 21st Century.Kevin Downing - 2001 - Educational Studies 27 (3):229-235.
The Internet Doctor and Medical Ethics Ethical Implications of the Introduction of the Internet Into Medical Encounters.Göran Collste - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):121-125.
The Impact of Web 2.0 on the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Bernard Lo & Lindsay Parham - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):17-26.
The Hippocratic Bargain and Health Information Technology.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):7-13.
Health Professionals' Attitude Towards Information Disclosure to Cancer Patients in China.Zeng Tieying, Huang Haishan, Zhao Meizhen, Li Yan & Fang Pengqian - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (3):356-363.
Ethical and Epistemic Issues in Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertising: Where is Patient Agency? [REVIEW]Catherine A. Womack - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):275-280.
Ethical Practice in Internet Research Involving Vulnerable People: Lessons From a Self-Harm Discussion Forum Study (SharpTalk).S. Sharkey, R. Jones, J. Smithson, E. Hewis, T. Emmens, T. Ford & C. Owens - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):752-758.
Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges.Corey M. Angst - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S2):169 - 178.
Data, Information and Knowledge: The Health Informatics Model and its Role in Evidence‐Based Medicine.Andrew Georgiou - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):127-130.
Health Professionals Ethical and Legal Liability on Patient’s Inadequate Clarification in Order to Obtain Free and Informed Consent.Mônica da Costa Serra - 2010 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 20 (5):160-162.
Screening: The Information Individuals Need to Support Their Decision: Per Protocol Analysis is Better Than Intention-to-Treat Analysis at Quantifying Potential Benefits and Harms of Screening.Paolo Giorgi Rossi - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):28.
Organizational Repertoires and Rites in Health Information Security.Ted Cooper, Jeff Collmann & Henry Neidermeier - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4):441-452.
Awareness of Costs and Individual Accountability in Health Care.Sofia Rt Nunes, Guilhermina Rego & Rui Nunes - 2013 - Nursing Ethics 20 (6):0969733012468464.