Human Rights and Genetic Discrimination: Protecting Genomics' Promise for Public Health

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):377-389 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The potential power of predictive genetic testing as a risk regulator is impressive. By identifying asymptomatic individuals who are at risk of becoming ill, predictive genetic testing may enable those individuals to take prophylactic measures. As new therapies become available, the usefulness of genetic testing undoubtedly will increase. Further, when a person's family medical history indicates a propensity towards a particular genetic disease, a negative test result may open up otherwise denied opportunities by showing that this person has not inherited suspect genes. In the latter type of case, a negative test result may reassure the individual that pursuing a particular course of action is worthwhile, or may convince prospective employers that the individual will be a serviceable employee.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Health, Human Rights, and Ethics.Eric Stover & Harvey Weinstein - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (3):335-335.
Public Health and the Rights of States.A. Miklos - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (2):158-170.
Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement.B. M. Kious - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Public Health and Human Rights.Rida Usman Khalafzai - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (3):4.
Genomics and the intrinsic value of plants.Bart Gremmen - 2005 - Genomics, Society and Policy 1 (3):1-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
20 (#752,463)

6 months
7 (#416,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anita Silvers
Last affiliation: San Francisco State University