Genetic Exceptionalism vs. Paradigm Shift: Lessons from HIV

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):141-148 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term “exceptionalism” was introduced into health care in 1991 when Bayer described “HIV exceptionalism” as the policy of treating the human immunodeficiency virus different from other infectious diseases, particularly other sexually transmitted diseases. It was reflected in the following practices: pre- and post-HIV test counseling, the development of specific separate consent forms for HIV testing, and stringent requirements for confidentiality of HIV test results. The justification for these practices was the belief that testing was essential for prevention and that patients might not seek HIV testing if confidentiality were not guaranteed. Confidentiality was believed to be particularly important given the degree of discrimination and stigmatization associated with the illness. Anonymous testing was a further step in ensuring strict confidentiality, even though such a practice prevented public officials from contacting partners and others who were at risk.

Other Versions

reprint Ross, Lainie Friedman (2001) "Genetic Exceptionalism vs. Paradigm Shift: Lessons from HIV". Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29(1):141-148

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,484

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
17 (#1,046,526)

6 months
5 (#898,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lainie Ross
University of Rochester

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
The Silent World of Doctor and Patient.Daniel Callahan & Jay Katz - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (6):47.

View all 11 references / Add more references