'Head or heart?' Revisited: Physilogy and political thought in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries

History of Political Thought 28 (2):208-229 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical metaphors pervade medieval European political writings. No attempt has been made to establish the relationship between bodily imageries of the political community and anatomical and/or physiological knowledge. A survey of bodily metaphors shows that the primacy of the head of the body politic was challenged at the turn of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries by an alternative view: the pre-eminence of the heart. This coincided with the penetration of Aristotelian physiology into scholastic medicine, which triggered debates over the most important member of the body natural: is it the head or the heart? The medical inspiration for the conceptualization of the body politic illustrates the great impact of the 'Aristotelian revolution' in medieval political thought

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Historical origins of the modern mind/body split.R. E. Lind - 2001 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (1):23-40.
The evolution of the caritas figure in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries.R. Freyhan - 1948 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 11 (1):68-86.
Personal values of accountants and accounting trainees in Cyprus.Maria Krambia-Kapardis & Anastasios Zopiatis - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (1):59-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
14 (#982,380)

6 months
1 (#1,472,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references