Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387 (1995)

In response to a series of allegations of scientific misconduct in the 1980’s, a number of scientific societies, national agencies, and academic institutions, including Harvard Medical School, devised guidelines to increase awareness of optimal scientific practices and to attempt to prevent as many episodes of misconduct as possible. The chief argument for adopting guidelines is to promote good science. There is no evidence that well-crafted guidelines have had any detrimental effect on creativity since they focus on design of research studies, documentation of research findings, assignment of credit through authorship, data management and supervision of trainees, not on the origin and evolution of ideas. This paper addresses a spectrum of causes of scientific misconduct or unacceptable scientific behavior and couples these with estimates of the potential for prevention if guidelines for scientific investigation are adopted. The conclusion is that clear and understandable guidelines should help to reduce the chance that flawed research will escape from our institutions. However, they cannot be relied upon alone to prevent all instances of scientific misconduct and should be regarded rather as one means of bolstering the integrity of the entire scientific enterprise.
Keywords scientific misconduct  research guidelines  scientific integrity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02583256
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Truth and Trustworthiness in Research.C. Whitbeck - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):403-416.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Accountability and Responsibility in Research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #224,201 of 2,519,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes