Van Inwagen’s Two Failed Arguments for the Belief in Freedom

Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):43-50 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Context, conditionals, fatalism, time travel, and freedom.John Carroll - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. MIT Press. pp. 79.
God, gratuitous evil, and van Inwagen's attempt to reconcile the two.Nick Trakakis - 2003 - Ars Disputandi: The Online Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (3):1-10.
Belief and freedom of mind.Christopher Hookway - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):195 – 204.
Reply to Van Inwagen.Richard Foley - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):101-103.
Van Inwagen on free will.John Martin Fischer - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (April):252-260.
Van Inwagen on free will.Peter Van Inwagen - 2001 - In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.
Testimony, testimonial belief, and safety.Charlie Pelling - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):205-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
28 (#569,665)

6 months
3 (#976,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Candice Shelby
University of Colorado at Denver

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references