Abstract

On the concept of human nature. Canguilhem, a third route between Chomsky and Foucault In 1971, Noam Chmosky and Michel Foucault publicly debated the issue of human nature. The latter exists according to Chomsky but does not exist according to Foucault. While the former considers that it coincides with the faculty of language understood as innate and a-historical capacity, the second identifies it with a kind of epistemological indicator whose scientific-philosophical scope varies from age to age. With the help of some 1971 debate comments, this text proposes a third interpretation of the human nature concept with respect to Chomsky's «Unhistoricism» and Foucault's «Scepticism»: from an unpublished text by Canguilhem dating back to 1969 and entitled Science et technique, it turns out that the French philosopher looks at the concept of «technique in the human sense» as a generic, immutable and coextensive component with human history. In our opinion, these characteristics constitute the fundamental principles for an exhaustive definition of «human nature».