Is Consent Useful When Resuscitation Isn't?

Hastings Center Report 21 (6):28-36 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Do Not Resuscitate order reflects a considered judgment that a physician can no longer stave off death. Why, then, have a patient consent to such an order? The primary point is that physicians should share with patients their judgment about what medicine can and cannot do. Because we cannot make death go away, we must make decisions about when to withhold or limit resuscitation openly, in honest and trusting conversation between doctor and patient.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

20 Is Consent Useful When Resuscitation Isn't?Gustav Mahler - forthcoming - Bioethics: Basic Writings on the Key Ethical Questions That Surround the Major, Modern Biological Possibilities and Problems.
Should the “Slow Code” Be Resuscitated?John D. Lantos & William L. Meadow - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):8-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)

6 months
13 (#219,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine.Robert L. Schwartz - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (2):159.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references