Warum angebliche Nachdrucke kantischer Schriften rechtmäßige Auflagen sind. Über die Nützlichkeit von Auflagenvergleichen und die historische Bedeutung der Buchmessen

Kant Studien 114 (2):354-382 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues against the assertion that several of Kant’s writings were published in the form of pirate editions. It seeks to establish that most of the the editions in question (printed between 1769 and 1803) were lawfully printed. Presumably, these editions were to be sold exclusively at book fairs in Frankfurt and Leipzig; both locations are printed on their title pages, although no information on the publisher is provided. The paper also presents crucial results of detailed comparisons of all contemporary editions of Kant’s writings and delivers a short historical sketch of eighteenth-century copyright law and the philosophical debate on this topic. Finally, the importance of book fairs for trading and selling books at that time is emphasized.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schriften über Algerien.Skadi Siiri Krause - 2021 - In Norbert Campagna, Oliver Hidalgo & Skadi Siiri Krause (eds.), Tocqueville-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Berlin: J.B. Metzler. pp. 55-57.
Zeit.Walter Mesch - 2011 - In Christof Rapp & Klaus Corcilius (eds.), Aristoteles-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Metzler. pp. 463-468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-08

Downloads
8 (#1,319,469)

6 months
3 (#979,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references