How important is truth to epistemology and knowledge? Some answers from comparative philosophy

Social Epistemology 15 (4):275 – 283 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02691720110093306

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Epistemology, realism, and truth: The first philosophical perspectives lecture.Ernest Sosa - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:1-16.
Epistemic comparative conditionals.Linton Wang - 2008 - Synthese 162 (1):133 - 156.
The value of knowledge and truth.Jonathan Kvanvig - unknown
Knowledge puzzles: an introduction to epistemology.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 1996 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Truth and weak knowledge in goldman’s veritistic social epistemology.Elke Brendel - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):3-17.
Epistemology after Protagoras: responses to relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus.Mi-Kyoung Lee - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Donald Davidson: truth, meaning, and knowledge.Urszula M. Żegleń (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#312,080)

6 months
5 (#639,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The ambiguity of “true” in English, German, and Chinese.Kevin Reuter - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Comparative History of World Philosophy.Ben-Ami Scharfstein - 1999 - Philosophy East and West 49 (1):96-97.

Add more references