Editorial

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2):68 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rationing and patient selection is inevitable in medical care, but in its most extreme form—when doctors and nurses decide about life and death—it is an almost unbearable burden for the profession. Eric Goemare, the Head of the South African Mission of Médicins Sans Frontières and his staff faced three equally difficult selection issues when rolling out antiretroviral treatment to HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa. Initially, the treatment had to be rationed due to lack of financial resources. Today, rationing is mostly due to lack of human resources. But at the same time, patients are being deselected because of nonadherence to the treatment regime to avoid the creation of multi-drug-resistant strains of the HIV virus

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Doris Schroeder - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):301.
Is It Ethical to Study What Ought Not to Happen? 1.Stuart Rennie - 2006 - Developing World Bioethics 6 (2):71-77.
AIDS and Drug Rationing.Pooneh Salari Sharif & Mahshad Noroozi - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 3:1-7.
Editorial: Rights and Procreative Liberty.Doris Schroeder - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):325-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
7 (#1,407,497)

6 months
7 (#592,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Doris Schroeder
University of Central Lancashire

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references