Archaeology and respect for the dead

Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (3):237–249 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

abstract Contemporary archaeologists commonly acknowledge moral responsibilities to the descendants of the subjects whose remains they disturb. There has been comparatively little reflection within the professional community on whether they have duties to the dead themselves. I argue that doing wrong to the dead is not reducible to harming their successors; that there are ways in which archaeologists can wrong the dead qua the living persons they once were; and that nevertheless this may not have such radical implications for the practice of archaeology as might first be imagined.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpretive archaeology: a reader.Julian Thomas (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Leicester University Press.
Research on dead infants.R. S. Downie - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):161-175.
Do Not Disturb? Archaeology and the Rights of the Dead.Paul Bahn - 1984 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (2):213-225.
Respect for the dead and dying.Anthony Preus - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):409-416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#377,400)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoffrey Scarre
Durham University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references