Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst (1999)

Abstract
The argument in Plato's Philebus presents three successive formulations of the hedonist principle. Commentators often take Socrates' argument in the dialogue to be dealing solely with the third formulation, which states that pleasure, rather than intelligence, is closer in nature to the good. I argue that, nonetheless, in the dialogue Socrates remained concerned to provide a direct refutation of the first formulation, that is, of the straightforward claim that pleasure is the good for all living beings. ;Chapter One ascribes to the Philebus a conception of intrinsic good, which is then shown to underlie the dialogue's notion of true pleasures. Chapter Two examines in detail the problem of the "one and many" concerning pleasure, and argues that this is the problem of forms in relation to other forms, rather than that of forms in relation to particulars. This interpretation is the one that is consistent both with Protarchus' understanding of hedonism in the dialogue, and with the dialogue's methodological passages, i.e., the passages on the "god-given method" and on the four ontological kinds. In Chapter Three, it is shown how division into forms is required by Socrates' conception of the nature of pleasure. Some of the forms of pleasure are ways in which falsity is admitted into the nature of pleasure. Three accounts of false anticipatory pleasures---those of Kenny and Gosling, Mooradian, and Penner---are examined in some detail
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Greek Grammar.D. M. Jones, H. W. Smyth & Gordon M. Messing - 1959 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 79:193-194.
Plato’s Examination of Pleasure.R. Hackforth - 1945 - Philosophy 21 (79):182-183.
Logic.W. E. Johnson - 1925 - Philosophical Review 34 (1):79-87.
Logic.H. R. Smart & W. E. Johnson - 1925 - Philosophical Review 34 (1):79.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The General Account of Pleasure in Plato's Philebus.Thomas Tuozzo - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):495-513.
Pleasure as Genesis in Plato’s Philebus.Amber D. Carpenter - 2011 - Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):73-94.
The Philebus on Pleasure: The Good, the Bad and the False.Verity Harte - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):111–128.
An Inconsistency in the Philebus?Joachim Aufderheide - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (5):817 - 837.
The Argument of the Philebus.Joe Mccoy - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):1-16.
Socrates, Pleasure, and Value.George Rudebusch - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Freedom in the Philebus.James L. Wood - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:205-216.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
7 ( #1,063,221 of 2,497,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,497,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes