| Authors |
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1615/EthicsBiologyEngMed.2015014314 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters.Robert Sparrow - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):6-15.
Risks and Benefits of Human Germline Genome Editing: An Ethical Analysis.Giovanni Rubeis & Florian Steger - 2018 - Asian Bioethics Review 10 (2):133-141.
Similar books and articles
Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
The Ethics of Gene Editing Technologies in Human Stem Cells.Michael W. Nestor, Elena Artimovich & Richard L. Wilson - 2014 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal 5 (4):323-338.
Ocular Gene Transfer in the Spotlight: Implications of Newspaper Content for Clinical Communications.Shelly Benjaminy & Tania Bubela - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):58.
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing of Human?-Globin Gene in Human Cells: A Commentary on the Research Ethics.Norman K. Swazo - 2015 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):22-26.
“Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR.Ben Merriman - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: – An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. [REVIEW]Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
“Molecular Gene”: Interpretation in the Right Context. [REVIEW]Degeng Wang - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):453-464.
Comparative Analysis of the Risk-Handling Procedures for Gene Technology Applications in Medical and Plant Science.Anna Lydia Svalastog, Petter Gustafsson & Stefan Jansson - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):465-479.
Historical Development of the Concept of the Gene.Petter Portin - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):257 – 286.
Investigating Psychology's Taboo: The Ethics of Editing.Richard Rogers - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):253 – 261.
The Life and Death of Gene Families.Jeffery P. Demuth & Matthew W. Hahn - 2009 - Bioessays 31 (1):29-39.
CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing to Cure Serious Diseases: Treat the Patient, Not the Germ Line.Ante S. Lundberg & Rodger Novak - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):38-40.
Gene Technology, Food Production, and Public Opinion: A UK Study. [REVIEW]Paul Sparks, Richard Shepherd & Lynn J. Frewer - 1994 - Agriculture and Human Values 11 (1):19-28.
Research on the Human Genome and Patentability--The Ethical Consequences.A. Pompidou - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):69-71.
Canadian Research Ethics Boards, MRI Research Risks, and MRI Risk Classification.Jennifer Marshall & Michael Hadskis - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (4):9-15.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-02-04
Total views
93 ( #125,635 of 2,507,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,781 of 2,507,013 )
2016-02-04
Total views
93 ( #125,635 of 2,507,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,781 of 2,507,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
