From "Bio-Power" to "Neuropolitics"

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (2):123-137 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Foucault, power in modern society is diffuse and pervasive, and works through the agency of free subjects. Its imperatives are internalized by indi­viduals who become self-disciplined, are tied to a particular identity, and govern their own behavior accordingly. Drawing on recent insights from neuroscience, the whole process of norm internalization can be seen as an expression of “neuropower” and a form of “neuropolitics” through which social and power relations become ingrained not just in human bodies and minds, but also in human brains. In recent decades, this process has been partly reversed as a result of the proliferation of information technologies and the electronic media.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From.Ivelin Sardamov - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (2):123-137.
Foucault and Power Revisited.Nathan Widder - 2004 - European Journal of Political Theory 3 (4):411-432.
The power of power—questions to Michel Foucault.Norbert Ricken - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):541–560.
Bourdieu and Foucault on power and modernity.Ciaran Cronin - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85.
Foucault on politics, security and war.Michael Dillon & Andrew W. Neal (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Besley on Foucault’s Discourse of Education.George Lazaroiu - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (8):821-832.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
50 (#315,679)

6 months
4 (#779,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?