Authors
Pietro Salis
Universita di Cagliari
Abstract
Wittgenstein’s Investigations proposed an egalitarian view about language games, emphasizing their plurality (“language has no downtown”). Uses of words depend on the game one is playing, and may change when playing another. Furthermore, there is no privileged game dictating the rules for the others: games are as many as purposes. This view is pluralist and egalitarian, but it says little about the connection between meaning and use, and about how a set of rules is responsible for them in practice. Brandom’s Making It Explicit attempted a straightforward answer to these questions, by developing Wittgensteinian insights: the primacy of social practice over meanings; the idea that meaning is use; the idea of rule–following to understand participation in social practices. Nonetheless, Brandom defended a non–Wittgensteinian conception of discursive practice: language has a “downtown”, the game of “giving and asking for reasons”. This is the idea of a normative structure of language, consisting of advancing claims and drawing inferences. By means of assertions, speakers undertake “commitments” that can be challenged/defended in terms of reasons (those successfully justified can gain “entitlement”). This game is not one among many: it is indispensable to the very idea of discursive practice. In this paper, my aim will be that of exploring the main motivations and implications of both perspectives.
Keywords Discursive Practice  Inferentialism  Language Games  Pluralism  Rule Following  Brandom  Wittgenstein  Expressivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Making It Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
Inference and Meaning.Wilfrid Sellars - 1953 - Mind 62 (247):313-338.
Naturalism Without Representationalism.Huw Price - 2004 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. pp. 71--88.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Inferenzialismo, pratiche argomentative e oggettività.Pietro Salis - 2012 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 6 (3):108-20.
Wittgenstein's Language‐Games.Max Black - 1979 - Dialectica 33 (3‐4):337-353.
4 Playing Well.David Egan - 2013 - In Emily Ryall (ed.), The Philosophy of Play. Routledge. pp. 54.
Can One Grasp Propostions Without Knowing a Language?John-Michael Kuczynski - 2005 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 24 (2).
Communication, Language and Autonomy.Raffaela Giovagnoli - 2009 - Etica E Politica 11 (1):260-270.
Wittgenstein's Concept of a Language-Game.Ronald Frank Bienert - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
"Let Us Imagine...": Wittgenstein's Invitation to Philosophy.Beth Savickey - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (2):98-115.
Wittgenstein. Playing on the Edges of Language.Francesco Valagussa - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):291-305.
Normative Pragmatism, Interpretationism, and Discursive Recognition.Joshua Wretzel - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:379-398.
Language‐Games.Jaakko Hintikka - 1977 - Dialectica 31 (3‐4):225-245.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-02

Total views
201 ( #57,627 of 2,506,008 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #37,121 of 2,506,008 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes