- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
By their properties, causes and Effects: Newton's Scholium on time, space, place and motion—II. The context
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (2):295-321 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
By their properties, causes and effects: Newton's scholium on time, space, place and motion—I. The text.Robert Rynasiewicz - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (1):133-153.
Newton’s Criticism of Descartes’s Concept of Motion.Matjaž Vesel - 2022 - Filozofski Vestnik 42 (3).
Definitions more geometrarum and Newton's scholium on space and time.Zvi Biener - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics:179-191.
Space and relativity in Newton and Leibniz.Richard Arthur - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
Can Parts of Space Move? On Paragraph Six of Newton’s Scholium.Graham Nerlich - 2005 - Erkenntnis 62 (1):119-135.
Public claims, private worries: Newton's principia and Leibniz's theory of planetary motion.D. Meli - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (3):415-449.
Public claims, private worries: Newton's principia and Leibniz's theory of planetary motion.D. Bertoloni Meli - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (3):415-449.
Absolute space and Newton's theory of relativity.Robert DiSalle - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 71:232-244.
Newton and Descartes: Theology and natural philosophy.Andrew Janiak - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):414-435.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-04-09
Downloads
130 (#167,510)
6 months
7 (#673,909)
2009-04-09
Downloads
130 (#167,510)
6 months
7 (#673,909)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Time Remains.Sean Gryb & Karim P. Y. Thébault - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):663-705.
Substantivalism vs Relationalism About Space in Classical Physics.Shamik Dasgupta - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (9):601-624.
Einstein, the reality of space, and the action-reaction principle.Dennis Lehmkuhl, P. Ghose & Harvey Brown - unknown
Newton’s Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space.Edward Slowik - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):419-448.
On the distinction between absolute and relative motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):70-93.
References found in this work
World enough and space‐time: Absolute versus relational theories of space and time.Robert Toretti & John Earman - 1989 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):723.
From the closed world to the infinite universe.A. Koyré - 1957 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 148:101-102.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-4qrhw uwo