Synthese 23 (1-2):47 - 62 (1972)

The significance of absolute space and absolute motion in the Critical philosophy is clarified by analysis of relevant passages in Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Newton's absolute space is rejected in favor of absolute space conceived of as an idea of reason serving to unify the infinity of possible relative kinematic spaces. On the other hand, something like newton's concept of absolute motion (e.g., in the case of rotation) is accepted by Kant under the heading of real - as opposed to illusory - motion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00414144
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant's Formulation of the Laws of Motion.Robert Palter - 1972 - Synthese 24 (1-2):96 - 116.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion.John T. Roberts - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why the Parts of Absolute Space Are Immobile.Nick Huggett - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):391-407.
Newton’s Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space.Ori Belkind - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.


Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #161,487 of 2,518,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes