Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and what

Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):66-80 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper supports the need for health professionals to be trained in argumentation theory, by illustrating the challenges that they face in interacting with patients and according to the different models of consultation that patients prefer. While there is no ideal model of consultation that can be promoted universally, the ability to construct arguments in support of health professionals’ points of view, as well as the ability to engage in critical discussion with patients, translate in essential skills for reaching patients’ agreement when communication develops through the interpretative model or the informed decision model or, eventually, shared decision-making. Keywords: models of consultation, argumentation skills, medical training, patient-centeredness, informed consent



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,898

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed consent: a primer for clinical practice.Deborah Bowman - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Spicer & Rehana Iqbal.
The silent world of doctor and patient.Jay Katz - 1984 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Informed consent Hong Kong style: An instance of moderate familism.Ho Mun Chan - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):195 – 206.
Medical decision making: a physician's guide.Alan Schwartz - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by George Bergus.


Added to PP

44 (#277,956)

6 months
1 (#479,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?