Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication

Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):550-569 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present a case for the value of argumentation as an instrument of rational persuasion in doctor-patient (and general health professional–patient) communication. By doing so, I also emphasize the value of argumentation theory—as a body of knowledge devoted to the study of argumentation—both to enrich the study of doctor-patient communication and to enhance its quality by contributing to dedicated training courses for health professionals and patient education interventions. Argumentation is used in health professional–patient interactions, and its significance in this context has been acknowledged in recent literature (see the collection of articles in Rubinelli and ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.J. Anthony Blair - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and what.Sara Rubinelli & Claudia Zanini - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):66-80.
Medicine as a trade.Marian Rabinowitz - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (3):255-261.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-04

Downloads
37 (#420,900)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?