Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change

European Journal of Social Theory 12 (4):543-569 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article conceptualizes power in the context of long-term process of structural change. First, it discusses the field of transition studies, which deals with processes of structural change in societal systems on the basis of certain presumptions about power relations, but still lacks an explicit conceptualization of power. Then the article discusses some prevailing points of contestation in debates on power. It is argued that for the context of transition studies, it is necessary to develop an interdisciplinary framework in which power is explicitly conceptualized in relation to change. Subsequently, such a framework is presented, with reference to existing literature on power. Starting with a philosophical and operational definition of power, a typology is developed of the different ways in which power can be exercised, explicitly including innovative power and transformative power. Finally, the presented power framework is applied to transition studies, redefining pivotal transition concepts in terms of power and formulating hypotheses on the role of power in transitions. By doing so, the article not only offers an interdisciplinary framework to study power in the context of transition studies, but also contributes to power debates more generally by including innovation and transformation as acts of power, and thereby proposes a re-conceptualization of the relation between power and structural change.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Structural Power.Joanna Szalacha - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:781-788.
The Power of Power—Questions to Michel Foucault.Norbert Ricken - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):541-560.
Facetten der Macht.Peter Koller - 1991 - Analyse & Kritik 13 (2):107-133.
Power after Hegemony.Scott Lash - 2007 - Theory, Culture and Society 24 (3):55-78.
The power of power—questions to Michel Foucault.Norbert Ricken - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):541–560.
Nietzsche's Concept of Will-to-Power: A Critical Study.Pujarini Das - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Hyderabad
Power: A Philosophical Analysis.Peter Morriss - 1987 - New York: Manchester University Press.
Power in the Structure of Power Relations.Ivan Buraj - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (5):417-427.
The Forms of Power.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 1988 - Analyse & Kritik 10 (1):3-31.
On the margins of power.Antonio Cerella - unknown - Philosophy in a Time of Crisis.
Balance of power and the problem of perception.Johan Galtung - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):277 – 294.
A global tradition? Power and historicity.Krzysztof Ziarek - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):103-120.
Power and Freedom: Opposite or Equivalent Concepts?Pamela Pansardi - 2012 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 59 (132):26-44.
On Parasitism and Overflow in Nietzsche's Doctrine of Will to Power.Matt Dill - 2017 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 48 (2):190-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
7 (#1,356,784)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Prince.Niccolo Machiavelli - 1640 - New York: Humanity Books. Edited by W. K. Marriott.
Power: A Radical View.Steven Lukes & Jack H. Nagel - 1976 - Political Theory 4 (2):246-249.
The Power Elite.C. Wright Mills - 1957 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 19 (2):328-329.
The Power Elite.C. Wright Mills - 2005 - In Christopher Grey & Hugh Willmott (eds.), Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie. Oxford University Press. pp. 328-329.

View all 11 references / Add more references