The Truth About Better Understanding?

Erkenntnis 88 (2):747-770 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The notion of understanding occupies an increasingly prominent place in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and moral theory. A central and ongoing debate about the nature of understanding is how it relates to the truth. In a series of influential contributions, Catherine Elgin has used a variety of familiar motivations for antirealism in philosophy of science to defend a non- factive theory of understanding. Key to her position are: (i) the fact that false theories can contribute to the upwards trajectory of scientific understanding, and (ii) the essential role of inaccurate idealisations in scientific research. Using Elgin’s arguments as a foil, I show that a strictly factive theory of understanding has resources with which to offer a unified response to both the problem of idealisations and the role of false theories in the upwards trajectory of scientific understanding. Hence, strictly factive theories of understanding are viable notwithstanding these forceful criticisms.

Similar books and articles

Idealizations and scientific understanding.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.
Scientific understanding: truth or dare?Henk W. de Regt - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3781-3797.
World-involving Scientific Understanding.Stathis Psillos - 2017 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):5-18.
Understanding and the facts.Catherine Elgin - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):33 - 42.
Scientific progress: Four accounts.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11):e12525.
Understanding and Equivalent Reformulations.Josh Hunt - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (5):810-823.
True enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):113–131.
True Enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2017 - Cambridge: MIT Press.


Added to PP

551 (#31,476)

6 months
136 (#23,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lewis Ross
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

Afactivism about understanding cognition.Samuel D. Taylor - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Individualism and the mental.Tyler Burge - 1979 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.

View all 59 references / Add more references