Conclusion

In Art Before the Law: Aesthetics and Ethics. University of Toronto Press. pp. 159-160 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3138/9781442669451-009

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In defence of repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Two types of multiple-conclusion systems.A. Avron - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (5):695-718.
Resolving the repugnant conclusion.Tyler Cowen - unknown
Probability and scepticism.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - In Dylan Dodd Elia Zardini (ed.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-86.
Imprecise lexical superiority and the (slightly less) Repugnant Conclusion.James Fanciullo - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (8):2103-2117.
Acceptance, inference, and the multiple-conclusion sequent.Tor Sandqvist - 2012 - Synthese 187 (3):913-924.
A bayesian paradox.Ruth Weintraub - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):51-66.
Three steps to rational imagining?Jennifer Church - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):456-456.
Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standards of Proof.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):215-243.
Admissibility in Positive Logics.Alex Citkin - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (4):421-437.
Proof.Jessica Brown - unknown
Logic and Normativity.Elizabeth Olsen - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Otago
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
The Very Repugnant Conclusion.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2003 - In Krister Segerberg & Ryszard Sliwinski (eds.), Logic, Law, Morality: Thirteen Essays in Practical Philosophy in Honour of Lennart Åqvist. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University. pp. 29-44.
Does the repugnant conclusion have any probative force?Christopher Cowie - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3021-3039.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-11

Downloads
10 (#1,220,343)

6 months
1 (#1,514,069)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Ronen
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references