Constructing One’s Arguments Based on Refutations of the Other’s Discourse. A Study of the Traditional Presidential Debate: Chirac/Jospin (1995) Versus Sarkozy/Royal [Book Review]

Argumentation 29 (1):19-32 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study focuses on the use and function of refutation in two televised debates during which candidates who have reached the second round of the French presidential elections come face to face. The aim of this study is to examine the forms and functions of refutation within the theoretical framework of dialogism. The rhetorical-argumentative functions of refutation and the challenges of this discursive practice in the genre “televised political debate” will also be put forward

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mitt Romney in Denver.Justin Ward Kirk - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):227-248.
Corpus linguistics and argumentation.Chiara Degano - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (2):113-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-21

Downloads
18 (#201,463)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations