Paranormal belief, thinking style preference and susceptibility to confirmatory conjunction errors

, &
Consciousness and Cognition 65 (C):182-196 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.013

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Paranormal belief and errors of probabilistic reasoning: The role of constituent conditional relatedness in believers' susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy.Paul Rogers, John E. Fisk & Emma Lowrie - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 56:13-29.
Skeptical Saints and Critical Cognition: On the Relationship between Religion and Paranormal Beliefs.Douglas S. Krull & Eric S. McKibben - 2006 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 28 (1):269-285.
Skeptical Saints and Critical Cognition: On the Relationship between Religion and Paranormal Beliefs.Douglas S. Krull & Eric S. McKibben - 2006 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie 28 (1):269-285.
Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Paul Seli, Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang - 2012 - Cognition 123 (3):335-346.
Introducing the Modified Paranormal Belief Scale: Distinguishing Between Classic Paranormal Beliefs, Religious Paranormal Beliefs and Conventional Religiosity Among Undergraduates in Northern Ireland and Wales.Emyr Williams, Christopher Lewis & Leslie Francis - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):345-356.
Believe It Or Not: Religious and Other Paranormal Beliefs in the United States.Tom W. Rice - 2003 - Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42 (1):95-106.
Deliberative adjustments of intuitive anchors: the case of diversification behavior.Shahar Ayal, Dan Zakay & Guy Hochman - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):131-145.
A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.Jerome Tobayck - 2004 - International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 23:94-98.
The Effectiveness of Instruction in Scientific Reasoning in Altering Paranormal Beliefs in High School Students.Paul Revere Priest - 1995 - Dissertation, La Sierra University
Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics.Michiel van Elk - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):1041-1046.
Refusing to budge: a confirmatory bias in decision making?Lea-Rachel D. Kosnik - 2007 - Mind and Society 7 (2):193-214.
Yet more modal logics of preference change and belief revision.Jan van Eijck - unknown
Magic and memory: using conjuring to explore the effects of suggestion, social influence, and paranormal belief on eyewitness testimony for an ostensibly paranormal event.Krissy Wilson & Christopher C. French - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Critically thinking about paranormal belief.Peter Lamont - 2007 - In Sergio Della Sala (ed.), Tall Tales About the Mind and Brain: Separating Fact From Fiction. Oxford University Press. pp. 23.
Reports of Paranormal Experiences: Can Transliminality Tell Us Anything About Them?Michael A. Thalbourne - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):375-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-08

Downloads
27 (#587,064)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
On the psychology of prediction.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1973 - Psychological Review 80 (4):237-251.

View all 10 references / Add more references