Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment

&
Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary: Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.Peter Lewinski - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
The inverse conjunction fallacy.Martin Jönsson & James A. Hampton - 2006 - Journal of Memory and Language 55:317-334.
Whose is the fallacy? A rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1980 - Cognition 8 (March):89-92.
On the nature of the conjunction fallacy.Rodrigo Moro - 2009 - Synthese 171 (1):1 - 24.
On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence.Gary Charness, Edi Karni & Dan Levin - unknown
Kahneman, Tversky, and Kahneman-Tversky: three ways of thinking.P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (4):531-547.
Walter the Banker: The Conjunction Fallacy Reconsidered. [REVIEW]Stephan Hartmann & Wouter Meijs - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):73-87.
On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1979 - Cognition 7 (December):385-407.
Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):97-102.
On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):592-596.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
163 (#148,320)

6 months
17 (#173,356)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the proper treatment of connectionism.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
In Defense of Fanaticism.Hayden Wilkinson - 2022 - Ethics 132 (2):445-477.
Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding?Lisa Miracchi Titus - 2024 - Cognitive Systems Research 83 (101174):1-13.

View all 589 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references