Determinism: Did Libet Make the Case?

Philosophy 87 (3):395-401 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Benjamin Libet's influential publications have raised important questions about voluntarist accounts of action. His findings are taken as evidence that the processes in the central nervous system associated with the initiation of an action occur earlier than the decision to act. However, in light of the methods employed and of relevant findings drawn from research addressed to the timing of neurobehavioural processes, Libet's conclusions are untenable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does the Brain Lead the Mind?Storrs Mccall - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):262-265.
Volition and the readiness potential.Gilberto Gomes - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (8-9):59-76.
The cycle of action: A commentary on Garry young (2006).Sean A. Spence - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (3):69-72.
Libet's impossible demand.Neil Levy - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (12):67-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
57 (#280,725)

6 months
12 (#213,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Elizabeth Fehrer & David Raab - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (2):143.

Add more references