Commentary

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):377-378 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This case is not about whether retransplant candidates should receive organs over first-time candidates, or whether risks of transplant failure from psychological or social factors are relevant to allocating organs. Rather, it concerns only this patient's qualifications to wait for a kidney transplant. Should the patient's prior transplants, noncompliance, and poor social network exclude her even from the waiting list? Do attending physicians inappropriately favor their patients over all others in need of transplants just by listing them? The answers turn on the difference between identifying a transplant need and allocating an organ

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bijuralism: an economic approach.Albert Breton & M. J. Trebilcock (eds.) - 2006 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub. Company.
Philosophical commentary.Gerhard Seel - 2001 - In Gerhard Seel, Jean-Pierre Schneider, Daniel Schulthess, Mario Mignucci & Ammonius (eds.), Ammonius and the Seabattle: Texts, Commentary and Essays. De Gruyter.
Richard Rufus’s De anima Commentary.Rega Wood - 2001 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 10 (1):119-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
23 (#678,765)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references