God and Goodness

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hugh Rice explains why belief in God need not be seen as a strange or irrational kind of belief, but can be a natural extension of our ordinary ways of thinking. He suggests that we should think of God in an abstract way, and he offers a satisfying account of the relationship between God and goodness. Anyone interested in the nature of God and the basis of religious belief will enjoy this book.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God and goodness.James Rachels - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring philosophy of religion: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
God and goodness.J. W. C. Wand - 1947 - London,: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
God and Goodness. [REVIEW]Basil Mitchell - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (2):223-246.
God and Goodness.Mark Wynn - 2001 - Mind 110 (437):301-304.
Mark Wynn: God and Goodness. [REVIEW]Charles C. Taliaferro - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):137-139.
God and Goodness. [REVIEW]Brendan Sweetman - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):136-138.
Philosophical explorations: freedom, God, and goodness.Steven M. Cahn (ed.) - 1989 - Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
God and goodness: a theological exploration.Stanley Hauerwas - 2011 - In Ruth Weissbourd Grant (ed.), In search of goodness. London: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-31

Downloads
12 (#1,115,280)

6 months
60 (#84,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine‐Tuning of the Universe.Robin Collins - 2009 - In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 202–281.
The Intrinsic Probability of Grand Explanatory Theories.Ted Poston - 2020 - Faith and Philosophy 37 (4):401-420.
What God might be.John Leslie - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (1):63-75.
Classical and revisionary theism on the divine as personal: a rapprochement?Elizabeth Burns - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (2):151-165.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references