- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Publishing Biomedical Research: Roles and Responsibilities
Hastings Center Report 20 (3):23-27 (1990)
Abstract
Authors, reviewers, and editors have critical responsibilities to ensure the validity and utility of published biomedical research.My notes
Similar books and articles
Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process.Wendy Lipworth, Ian H. Kerridge, Stacy M. Carter & Miles Little - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective.Charles Weijer & Baruch A. Brody - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (1):47.
AIDS: Public Policy and Biomedical Research.Sandra Panem - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (4):23-26.
Biomedical Research and the Public: A Report from the Airlie House Conference.Peter Steinfels - 1976 - Hastings Center Report 6 (3):21-25.
Biomedical Research: A View from the State Legislature.William D. Delahunt - 1976 - Hastings Center Report 6 (2):25-26.
Patents, biomedical research, and treatments: Examining concerns, canvassing solutions.Josephine Johnston & Angela A. Wasunna - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (1):1-36.
Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? [REVIEW]Josephine Johnston, Marcia Angell & Sheldon Krimsky - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (5):44.
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Aceil Al-Khatib & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):293-321.
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):293-321.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
2 (#1,450,151)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
2013-11-22
Downloads
2 (#1,450,151)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship.Mohammad Hosseini & Bert Gordijn - 2020 - Accountability in Research 27 (5).
Beyond fabrication and plagiarism: The little murders of everyday science: Commentary on “six domains of research ethics”.Michael J. Zigmond & Beth A. Fischer - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):229-234.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-grz79 uwo