Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):57 - 81 (1996)

Authors
Eric Reitan
Oklahoma State University
Abstract
There seems to be nearly universal agreement that society cannot do without some form of criminal punishment. At the same time, it is generally acknowledged that punishment, involving as it does the imposition of hardship and suffering, stands in need of justification. What form such a justification should take, however, is a matter of considerable contention, in part because of basic theoretical disagreements on the nature of moral obligation, and in part because of disagreements concerning the nature and purpose of criminal punishment itself.These disagreements have given rise to a number of rival ‘theories’ of punishment - rival accounts of the purposes of punishment and the conditions which justify it. The traditional theories can be broadly categorized as deterrence theories, incapacitation theories, retributive theories, and rehabilitative theories. My purpose here is to contribute to this discussion on punishment by introducing a largely overlooked theory of punishment, one whose outlines can be found in the writings of Simone Wei!, but which has yet to be fully developed and discussed. This theory, which I call the ‘reintegrative theory,’ has, I believe, a number of advantages over more traditional theories of punishment.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1080/00455091.1996.10717444
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Moral Education Theory of Punishment.Jean Hampton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):208-238.
A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment.Herbert Morris - 1981 - American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (4):263 - 271.
Can Punishment Morally Educate?Russ Shafer-Landau - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (2):189 - 219.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Sense of Retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.
''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
The Passions of Punishment.Nathan Hanna - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):232-250.
Punishment: The Future.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):483-491.
Thomas Hobbes and the Philosophy of Punishment.Alan Norrie - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (2):299 - 320.
Must Punishment Be Intended to Cause Suffering?Bill Wringe - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):863-877.
Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2012 - Routledge.
Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):53-71.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
25 ( #458,145 of 2,519,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,332 of 2,519,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes