- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment
American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (4):263 - 271 (1981)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The significance of private burdens and lost benefits for a fair-play analysis of punishment.Shawn J. Bayern - unknown
Thomas Hobbes and the philosophy of punishment.Alan Norrie - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (2):299 - 320.
Justice and punishment: the rationale of coercion.Matt Matravers - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Adam Smith and the Theory of Punishment.Richard Stalley - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):69-89.
Foundations of a Kantian theory of punishment.J. Angelo Corlett - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):263-283.
Must Punishment Be Intended to Cause Suffering?Bill Wringe - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):863-877.
A Kantian critique of Kant's theory of punishment.Jean-Christophe Merle - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (3):311 - 338.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-29
Downloads
151 (#125,017)
6 months
12 (#213,833)
2011-05-29
Downloads
151 (#125,017)
6 months
12 (#213,833)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Introduction.Thomas Douglas & David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reconciliation as the Aim of a Criminal Trial: Ubuntu’s Implications for Sentencing.Thaddeus Metz - 2019 - Constitutional Court Review 9:113-134.
Justifications for Non-ÂConsensual Medical Intervention: From Infectious Disease Control to Criminal Rehabilitation.Jonathan Pugh & Thomas Douglas - 2016 - Criminal Justice Ethics 35 (3):205-229.
Punishment is Organized around Principles of Communicative Inference.Arunima Sarin, Mark K. Ho, Justin W. Martin & Fiery A. Cushman - 2021 - Cognition 208 (C):104544.
Neuro-interventions as Criminal Rehabilitation: An Ethical Review.Jonathan Pugh & Thomas Douglas - 2016 - In Jonathan Jacobs & Jonathan Jackson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. Routledge.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo