Revisiting Relational Pandemic Ethics in Light of the COVID-19 Abortion Bans in the United States

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 14 (1):141-156 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The experiences of working-class people and those from communities of color seeking abortions in the United States before and during COVID-19 call for feminist, relational pandemic ethics. Françoise Baylis and colleagues argue for public health ethics that emphasize relational personhood, relational autonomy, social justice, and solidarity. COVID-19 abortion bans in the United States require vigilance against powerful actors who abuse these values—particularly that of solidarity—to further their political, religious, and/or economic agendas in harmful ways. Thus, efforts to promote solidarity during a pandemic must attend to social injustice and systemic oppression and provide resources to vulnerable people.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relational ethical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic.David Ian Jeffrey - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):495-498.
Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19?Floris Tomasini - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (2):234-247.
Relational Solidarity and the COVID-19 Pandemic.Anita Ho - 2022 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 15 (1):117-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-04

Downloads
15 (#975,286)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amy Reed-Sandoval
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations