- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Relation priming, the lexical boost, and alignment in dialogue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):394-395 (2008)
Abstract
The authors' claim that analogical reasoning is the product of relational priming is compatible with language processing work that emphasizes the role of low-level automatic processes in the alignment of situation models in dialogue. However, their model ignores recent behavioral evidence demonstrating a effect on relational priming. We discuss implications of these dataMy notes
Similar books and articles
Two steps forward, one step back: Partner-specific effects in a psychology of dialogue.Susan E. Brennan & Charles A. Metzing - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):192-193.
Interactive alignment: Priming or memory retrieval?Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.
Priming and alignment: Mechanism or consequence?Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):193-194.
Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring.Niels O. Schiller & Jan Peter de Ruiter - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):208-209.
Dialogue: Can two be cheaper than one?Sam Glucksberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-199.
Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?Robert M. Krauss & Jennifer S. Pardo - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):203-204.
The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):212-225.
Full alignment of some but not all representations in dialogue.Holly P. Branigan - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):191-192.
Situation alignment and routinization in language acquisition.Peter F. Dominey - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):195-195.
A Computational Cognitive Model of Syntactic Priming.David Reitter, Frank Keller & Johanna D. Moore - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (4):587-637.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
46 (#339,736)
6 months
15 (#159,740)
2009-01-28
Downloads
46 (#339,736)
6 months
15 (#159,740)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Syntax drives phonological choice–even independently of word choice.Marie Nilsenová & Marije van Amelsvoort - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
References found in this work
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination.Simon Garrod & Anthony Anderson - 1987 - Cognition 27 (2):181-218.
Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering & Alexandra A. Cleland - 2000 - Cognition 75 (2):B13-B25.
Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations.U. Goswami - 1990 - Cognition 35 (1):69-95.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-nx2x8 uwo