Futile and False Rejoinders, Sophistical Arguments and Early Indian Logic

Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (5/6):545-558 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is indian logic nonmonotonic?John A. Taber - 2004 - Philosophy East and West 54 (2):143-170.
Indian logic in the early schools: a study of the Nyāyadarśana in its relation to the early logic of other schools.H. N. Randle - 1930 - New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp. : distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Knowledge and experience.Calvin Dwight Rollins (ed.) - 1962 - [Pittsburgh, Pa.]: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle.David Hitchcock - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221.
Place of logic in indian philosophy.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2015 - Lokayata: Journal of Positive Philosophy 2:39-49.
Universals: studies in Indian logic and linguistics.Frits Staal - 1988 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bhvaviveka's arguments for emptiness.Charles Goodman - 2008 - Asian Philosophy 18 (2):167 – 184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-01

Downloads
32 (#490,373)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Indian logic in the early schools: a study of the Nyāyadarśana in its relation to the early logic of other schools.H. N. Randle - 1930 - New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp. : distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

Add more references