Context-sensitive Argumentation: Dirty Tricks in the Sophistical Refutations and a Perceptive Medieval Interpretation of the Text

Vivarium 49 (1-3):75-94 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle in the central chapters of his Sophistical Refutations gives advice on how to counter unfair argumentation by similar means, all the while taking account not only of the adversary's arguments in themselves, but also of his philosophical commitments and state of mind, as well as the impression produced on the audience. This has offended commentators, and made most of them, medieval and modern alike, pass lightly over the relevant passages. A commentary that received the last touch in the very early 13th century is more perceptive because, it is argued, the commentator had lived in a 12th-century environment of competing Parisian schools that was in important respects similar to the one of Aristotle's Athens

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-29

Downloads
102 (#167,348)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sten Ebbesen
University of Copenhagen

References found in this work

Neglected Evidence for Diodorus Cronus.Nicholas Denyer - 2002 - Classical Quarterly 52 (2):597-600.

Add more references