The Validity of Inference and Argument

In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 135-160 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been common in contemporary logic and philosophy of logic to identify the validity of an inference with its conclusion being a (logical) consequence of its premisses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-02

Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)

6 months
13 (#219,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dag Prawitz
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
What is inference?Paul Boghossian - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):1-18.
The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic.Michael Dummett - 1978 - In Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 215--247.
Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. I.Gerhard Gentzen - 1935 - Mathematische Zeitschrift 35:176–210.

View all 10 references / Add more references