Following all the rules: Intuitionistic completeness for generalized proof-theoretic validity

Analysis 83 (3):507-516 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Prawitz conjectured that the proof-theoretically valid logic is intuitionistic logic. Recent work on proof-theoretic validity has disproven this. In fact, it has been shown that proof-theoretic validity is not even closed under substitution. In this paper, we make a minor modification to the definition of proof-theoretic validity found in Prawitz’s 1973paper ‘Towards a foundation of a general proof theory’ and refined by Schroeder-Heister in ‘Validity concepts in proof-theoretic semantics’ (2006). We will call the new notion generalized proof-theoretic validity and show that the logic of generalized proof-theoretic validity is intuitionistic logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-25

Downloads
29 (#568,517)

6 months
13 (#220,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Victor Barroso-Nascimento
Rio de Janeiro State University
Will Stafford
Kansas State University

Citations of this work

Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Base-extension semantics for modal logic.Timo Eckhardt & David J. Pym - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references