Philosophy of CRISPR-Cas: Introduction to Eugene Koonin’s target paper and commentaries

Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):16 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary of Koonin’s target paper, we defend an extended view of CRISPR-Cas immunity by arguing that CRISPR-Cas includes, but cannot be reduced to, defence against nonself. CRISPR-Cas systems can target endogenous elements and tolerate exogenous elements. We conclude that the vocabulary of “defence” and “nonself” might be misleading when describing CRISPR-Cas systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-14

Downloads
28 (#138,667)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Pradeu
CNRS & University Of Bordeaux

Citations of this work

Philosophy of immunology.Bartlomiej Swiatczak & Alfred I. Tauber - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2020.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question.Eugene V. Koonin & Petro Starokadomskyy - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 59:125-134.

View all 9 references / Add more references