Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144 (1996)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
: Justice is widely thought to consist in equality. For many theorists, the central question has been: Equality of what? The author argues that the ideal of equality distorts practical reasoning and has deeply counterintuitive implications. Moreover, an alternative view of distributive justice can give a better account of what egalitarians should care about than can any of the competing ideals of equality
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1353/ken.1996.0009 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Educational Equality Versus Educational Adequacy: A Critique of Anderson and Satz.Harry Brighouse & Adam Swift - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):117-128.
Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW]Harry Brighouse - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
97 ( #121,999 of 2,519,659 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,659 )
2009-01-28
Total views
97 ( #121,999 of 2,519,659 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,659 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads