Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?

Informal Logic 36 (4):563-593 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the University of Windsor’s Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric dedicated a two-day symposium to the topic and later published the proceedings. In this article, I argue against the existence of conductive arguments as a usefully distinct type of argument. Some of what are deemed conductive arguments are simply inductive arguments and some are best construed as subsets of the constituents of what is commonly called a position paper.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.
A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler.J. Anthony Blair - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):109-128.
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
Formalizing Informal Logic.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (4):508-538.


Added to PP

54 (#220,186)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references