Informal Logic 36 (4):563-593 (2016)
AbstractConductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the University of Windsor’s Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric dedicated a two-day symposium to the topic and later published the proceedings. In this article, I argue against the existence of conductive arguments as a usefully distinct type of argument. Some of what are deemed conductive arguments are simply inductive arguments and some are best construed as subsets of the constituents of what is commonly called a position paper.
Similar books and articles
The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.
Conductive arguments and the ‘inference to the best explanation’.Dean Goorden & Thomas Fischer - unknown
Conductive Argument as a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering.Yun Xie - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (1):2-22.
Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):240-275.
"Conductive" argumentation in the UK fracking debate.Isabela Fairclough - 2018 - In Studies in Logic and Argumentation. London, U.K.: College Publications.
Formalizing Informal Logic.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (4):508-538.
Commentary on: J. Anthony Blair's "Are conductive arguments really not possible?".Yun Xie & Min Ghui Xiong - unknown
A critical examination and development of Wellman’s theory of conductive argument.J. Blair & Dale Hample - unknown
Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning. [REVIEW]Jan Albert van Laar - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):337-344.
On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments.J. Katzav & C. A. Reed - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):239-259.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.
Just Following the Rules: Collapse / Incoherence Problems in Ethics, Epistemology, and Argumentation Theory.Patrick Bondy - 2020 - In J. Anthony Blair & Christopher Tindale (eds.), Rigour and Reason: Essays in Honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen. Windsor, ON, Canada: pp. 172-202.
References found in this work
No references found.