J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning: College Publications, London, 2011 [Book Review]

Argumentation 27 (3):337-344 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler.J. Anthony Blair - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):109-128.
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
From Critical Thinking to Non-conclusive Argument and Back Again. [REVIEW]Paul A. Wagner - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):34-38.
Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.
Defeasible reasoning in japanese criminal jurisprudence.Katsumi Nitta & Masato Shibasaki - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (1-2):139-159.
The epistemic basis of defeasible reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):437-458.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
35 (#435,969)

6 months
6 (#448,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Albert Van Laar
University of Groningen

References found in this work

Challenge and response.Carl Wellman - 1971 - Carbondale,: Southern Illinois University Press.
Morals & ethics.Carl Wellman - 1975 - Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.

Add more references