The Best Interest Standard for Health Care Decision Making: Definition and Defense

American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):36-38 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bester offers powerful arguments for why the harm principle cannot replace the best interest standard (BIS) as a guide for, and limit on, surrogate healthcare decision making (Bester 2018). Since B...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Living wills and substituted judgments: A critical analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.
Decision making in health care: commentary.Kenneth J. Gilhooly - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):231-233.
Decision making in health care: introduction.Rosemary A. Crow - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):203-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-24

Downloads
26 (#610,935)

6 months
7 (#430,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in health care.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David C. Thomasma.

View all 12 references / Add more references