Shared Decision Making, Paternalism and Patient Choice

Health Care Analysis 18 (1):60-84 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In patient centred care, shared decision making is a central feature and widely referred to as a norm for patient centred medical consultation. However, it is far from clear how to distinguish SDM from standard models and ideals for medical decision making, such as paternalism and patient choice, and e.g., whether paternalism and patient choice can involve a greater degree of the sort of sharing involved in SDM and still retain their essential features. In the article, different versions of SDM are explored, versions compatible with paternalism and patient choice as well as versions that go beyond these traditional decision making models. Whenever SDM is discussed or introduced it is of importance to be clear over which of these different versions are being pursued, since they connect to basic values and ideals of health care in different ways. It is further argued that we have reason to pursue versions of SDM involving, what is called, a high level dynamics in medical decision-making. This leaves four alternative models to choose between depending on how we balance between the values of patient best interest, patient autonomy, and an effective decision in terms of patient compliance or adherence: Shared Rational Deliberative Patient Choice, Shared Rational Deliberative Paternalism, Shared Rational Deliberative Joint Decision, and Professionally Driven Best Interest Compromise. In relation to these models it is argued that we ideally should use the Shared Rational Deliberative Joint Decision model. However, when the patient and professional fail to reach consensus we will have reason to pursue the Professionally Driven Best Interest Compromise model since this will best harmonise between the different values at stake: patient best interest, patient autonomy, patient adherence and a continued care relationship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shared decision-making and patient autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
The Concept of Negotiation in Shared Decision Making.Lars Sandman - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (3):236-243.
Paternalism modernised.G. B. Weiss - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):184-187.
Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Beyond Informed Consent - Part II.Kate Jones - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (2):6.
Non-patient decision-making in medicine: The eclipse of altruism.Margaret P. Battin - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):19-44.
An economic theory of patient decision-making.Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
122 (#142,624)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Munthe
University of Gothenburg