Martin Heidegger on Painting: Franz Marc and Paul Klee

Filozofska Istrazivanja 39 (2):445-460 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, Heidegger’s understanding of art is analysed with regard to the status of painting, for which I claim to be of equal status as poetry. Such claim is derived from Heidegger’s commentaries on Klee, which show that the essence of painting is not a presentation of beings, but the revelation of our grasp of Being. The same idea is analysed considering Heidegger’s short comment on Franz Marc from his early works, with the conclusion that Hedegger’s attack on an abstract painting is not the consequence of demand that painting should present us with some concrete being, some object. Finally, the specific status of poetry and painting indicate the new understanding of the image in Heidegger, which in return demands for the revision of the usual interpretation of Heidegger’s philosophy of art.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Way Back Down: Paul Klee’s Heights and Depths.David Farrell Krell - 2013 - Research in Phenomenology 43 (3):331-339.
Paul Klee’s Originary Painting.Alejandro A. Vallega - 2013 - Research in Phenomenology 43 (3):462-474.
Art and Phenomenology.Joseph Parry (ed.) - 2010 - Routledge.
Une « mutation » de l’art? Martin Heidegger et Paul Klee.Guillaume Fagniez - 2018 - Cahiers de Philosophie de L’Université de Caen 55:75-94.
Welt und Erde.Siegbert Peetz - 1995 - Heidegger Studies 11:167-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
12 (#1,085,763)

6 months
7 (#430,392)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references