- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Index
In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 257–270 (2008)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Theism Alternatives to Theism Naturalism and Its Woes Conclusion.Author Profiles
theistic belief ‐ belief in God and epistemology of theistic belief against naturalism theists argueing about whether god knows the future Why do people believe theism? “Sensus Divinitatis”—a sense of divinity, a faculty, a set of cognitive processes to know about God alternatives to theism theistic belief and knowledge naturalism and its woes and naturalism vs. proper function naturalism, skepticism, self‐defeat dualistic naturalism
My notes
Similar books and articles
Against Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 1–69.
Sensus divinitatis jako koncepcja genezy przekonań teistycznych.Stanisław Ruczaj - 2019 - Diametros 59:48-60.
Reforming reformed epistemology: a new take on the sensus divinitatis.Blake Mcallister & Trent Dougherty - 2019 - Religious Studies 55 (4):537-557.
Theism as Theory: Issues in the Epistemology of Religious Belief.Stephen Andrew Maitzen - 1992 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Theism in Historical Perspective.Timothy Chappell - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):123 - 138.
How to Use Cognitive Faculties You Never Knew You Had.Andrew Moon - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (S1):251-275.
Spirituality, Expertise, and Philosophers.Bryan Frances - 2013 - In L. Kvanvig Jonathan (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-81.
Reply to Tooley's opening statement.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 151–183.
Mutual Epistemic Dependence and the Demographic Divine Hiddenness Problem.Max Baker-Hytch - 2016 - Religious Studies 3 (52):375–394.
A debate between a theist and a santa clausist.Ruth Tallman & David Kyle Johnson - 2015 - Think 14 (40):27-41.
Against Plantinga's A/C Model: Consequences of the Codependence of the De Jure and De Facto Questions.Rebeka Ferreira - 2011 - Kent State University Graduate Philosophy Journal.
The Naturalness of Belief: New Essays on Theism’s Rationality.Paul Copan & Charles Taliaferro (eds.) - 2018 - Lanham: Lexington Books.
Haverá uma viável objeção de jure à crença teísta?Domingos Faria - 2015 - Evista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade Do Porto – Série de Filosofia 32.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
4 (#1,619,724)
6 months
1 (#1,462,504)
2023-06-15
Downloads
4 (#1,619,724)
6 months
1 (#1,462,504)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.Paul Churchland - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Incorporeality.Charles Taliaferro - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 292–299.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-vk9kt uwo