- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to Tooley's opening statement
In Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 151–183 (2008)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Justification Tooley's Arguments The Justification of Theistic Belief Is Evil a Defeater for Belief in God?Author's Profile
Michael Tooley's atheistic argument from evil Reply to Tooley's Opening Statement probabilistic argument from evil justification ‐ function of epistemic probability Tooley's “it is logical probability relative to one's total evidence” Tooley's argument ‐ argueing that default position is atheism Tooley's argument for improbability of G on evil justification of theistic belief Is evil a defeater for belief in god? if Christian belief is true ‐ then theistic belief is justified for many who hold it
My notes
Similar books and articles
Tooley and evil: A reply.Alvin Plantinga - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1):66 – 75.
Closing statement and reponse to Plantinga's comments.Michael Tooley - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga (ed.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 233–248.
Public Institutions for Cooperative Action: A Reply to James Tooley.Stewart Ranson - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):35-42.
Knowledge of God * by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley.T. J. Mawson - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):591-592.
Knowledge of God, by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley.J. Bishop - 2009 - Mind 118 (472):1163-1168.
Conditional logic and the significance of Tooleys example.Charles B. Cross - 2006 - Analysis 66 (4):325–335.
Alvin Plantinga and the argument from evil.Michael Tooley - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):360 – 376.
Review of Alvin Plantinga, Michael Tooley, Knowledge of God. [REVIEW]William L. Rowe - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
Can Robots think : reply to Tooley's second statement.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 218–232.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)
6 months
5 (#627,481)
2009-01-28
Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)
6 months
5 (#627,481)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Should CSR Give Atheists Epistemic Assurance? On Beer-Goggles, BFFs, and Skepticism Regarding Religious Beliefs.Justin L. Barrett & Ian M. Church - 2013 - The Monist 96 (3):311-324.
Natural Selection Does Care about Truth.Maarten Boudry & Michael Vlerick - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):65-77.
On an Epistemic Cornerstone of Skeptical Theism: in Defense of CORNEA.Timothy Perrine - 2022 - Sophia 61 (3):533-555.
Skeptical Theism and Morriston’s Humean Argument from Evil.Timothy Perrine - 2019 - Sophia 58 (2):115-135.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-bl6rh uwo