The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue. Part 4: general conclusion

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 7:14- (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the conclusion to this multi-part article I first review the discussions carried out around the six essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis – the position taken by Allen Frances on each question, the commentaries on the respective question along with Frances’ responses to the commentaries, and my own view of the multiple discussions. In this review I emphasize that the core question is the first – what is the nature of psychiatric illness – and that in some manner all further questions follow from the first. Following this review I attempt to move the discussion forward, addressing the first question from the perspectives of natural kind analysis and complexity analysis. This reflection leads toward a view of psychiatric disorders – and future nosologies – as far more complex and uncertain than we have imagined

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,576

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychiatry should not seek mechanisms of disorder.Daniel F. Hartner & Kari L. Theurer - 2018 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 38 (4):189-204.
Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence.Felicity Callard - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):526-530.

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
157 (#133,622)

6 months
16 (#154,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Schwartz
Texas A&M University
Peter Zachar
Auburn University Montgomery

Citations of this work

When psychiatric diagnosis becomes an overworked tool.George Szmukler - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):517-520.

Add more citations