Aristotle and Kant on the Validity of Metaphysics as a Science

Abstract

Contrast between Aristotle and Kant on whether Metaphysics can be considered a science. Draws from Books 4 and 6 of Aristotle's Metaphysics and Kant's Prolegomena on any Future Metaphysic.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
Metaphysics: A Critical Survey of Its Meaning. [REVIEW]C. H. - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):473-473.
Aristotle's metaphysics.S. Marc Cohen - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle's Metaphysics. Aristotle - 1966 - Clarendon Press.
Politics and Heidegger: Aristotle, Superman, and Žižek.Babette Babich - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (161):141-161.
Kant’s General Logic and Aristotle.Kurt Mosser - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:181-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-07

Downloads
221 (#91,295)

6 months
119 (#33,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references