Materialized ideology and environmental problems: The cases of solar geoengineering and agricultural biotechnology
European Journal of Social Theory 23 (3):389-410 (2020)
AbstractThis article expands upon the notion of ideology as a material phenomenon, usually in the form of institutionalized, taken-for-granted practices. It draws on Herbert Marcuse and related thinkers to conceptualize technological solutions to environmental problems as materialized ideological responses to social-ecological contradictions, which, by concealing these contradictions, reproduce existing social conditions. This article outlines a method of technology assessment as ideology critique that draws attention to: the social determinants of the given technology; whether the technology conceals or masks social-ecological contradictions; whether the technology reproduces existing social conditions; and whether the technology may be used for more rational or emancipatory ends in different social conditions. The examples of solar geoengineering and agricultural biotechnology are examined and it is found that, in each case, these technological solutions conceal social-ecological contradictions and support the current economic system and those benefiting from it, while precluding other alternatives.
Similar books and articles
Ideology and Agricultural Technology in the Late Twentieth Century: Biotechnology as Symbol and Substance. [REVIEW]Frederick H. Buttel - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):5-15.
Solar Geoengineering: Technology-Based Climate Intervention or Compromising Social Justice in Africa?Cush Ngonzo Luwesi, David R. Morrow & Dzigbodi Adzo Doke - 2016 - In Christopher Preston (ed.), Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Anthropocene. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 161–174.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
Crop Biotechnology for the Environment?Sven Ove Hansson & Karin Joelsson - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):759-770.
Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making.René von Schomberg (ed.) - 1992 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The Contradictions of the Biorevolution for the Development of Agriculture in the Third World: Biotechnology and Capitalist Interest. [REVIEW]J. Sousa Silva - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):61-70.
Biotechnology and Global Justice.Tony Smith - 1999 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):219-242.
Environmental Biotechnology Research: Challenges and Opportunities in Latin America.Janeth Sanabria - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (4):681-694.
Environmental and Social Implications of Waste in U.S. Agriculture and Food Sectors.David Pimentel - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):5-20.
The Ethics of Agri-Food Biotechnology : How Can an Agricultural Technology Be so Important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Ideology, Critique, and Social Structures.Matteo Bianchin - 2021 - Critical Horizons 22 (2):184-196.
An Invitation to Environmental Sociology.Michael Bell - 2011 - Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: Pine Forge Press.
Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation.Jack Stilgoe - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):851-869.
Geoengineering Governance, the Linear Model of Innovation, and the Accompanying Geoengineering Approach.Pak-Hang Wong & Nils Markusson - 2015 - The Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Papers.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society.Herbert Marcuse - 1964 - Routledge.
The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in Sociology and History of Technology (25th Anniversary Edition with New Preface).Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes & Trevor Pinch (eds.) - 1987 - MIT Press.